Ham Allen vs. Jim Andrews — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ham Allen and Jim Andrews are closely matched on the surface stats. Ham Allen posted stronger numbers in OPS (.586 vs .550) and slugging (.314 vs .272). Jim Andrews had the advantage in on-base percentage (.278 vs .271). By the career numbers, Ham Allen had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ham Allen and Jim Andrews
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
17
145.71
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
53
140.09
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.586
0.586
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
19
162.86
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
63
166.52
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.314
0.314
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.043
0.043
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.084
0.084
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.201
0.201
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.431
0.431
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
20
171.43
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
46
121.59
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
6.76
57.97
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
70
70
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Fielding Stats for Ham Allen and Jim Andrews
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.34
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
79
4.62
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
3.62
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
78.48
78.48
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.696
2.696
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698