Chad Allen vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Chad Allen. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .711) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .322). Chad Allen had the advantage in home run production (14 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Chad Allen and Jim Smith
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.725
0.725
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
102.37
66.19
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.389
0.389
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
0.12
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
106.65
68.95
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Chad Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
23
14.87
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Chad Allen and Jim Smith
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
202
1.1
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
189
1.03
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
406
2.22
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
397
2.17
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.78
97.78
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.965
1.965
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Chad Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.56
93.56
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100