Sam Agnew vs. Daniel Fields — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Sam Agnew. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .518) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .265). Sam Agnew had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Sam Agnew and Daniel Fields
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
1711
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
113.15
39.68
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.049
0.049
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.183
0.183
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
121.62
42.65
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 600 PA
7.92
7.92
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Fielding Stats for Sam Agnew and Daniel Fields
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 9 Innings
551
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2939
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2807
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Sam Agnew
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.51
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67