Nathan Adcock vs. Jim Peterson — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Nathan Adcock and Jim Peterson are fairly close on the surface numbers. Nathan Adcock posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.17 vs 5.27) and WHIP (1.520 vs 1.665). Jim Peterson had the advantage in home runs allowed (0.74 per nine innings vs 1.02). By the career numbers, Nathan Adcock had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.