Nathan Adcock vs. Sam Long — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Nathan Adcock and Sam Long are fairly close on the surface numbers. Nathan Adcock posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.17 vs 4.65) and home runs allowed (1.02 per nine innings vs 1.28). Sam Long had the advantage in WHIP (1.431 vs 1.520). By the career numbers, Nathan Adcock had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.