Spencer Adams vs. Erkie Wilson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Spencer Adams posted the stronger offensive profile against Erkie Wilson. Spencer Adams posted stronger numbers in OPS (.646 vs .300) and on-base percentage (.324 vs .300). By the career numbers, Spencer Adams had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Spencer Adams and Erkie Wilson
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
180
241.61
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
180
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
447
600
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.665
0.665
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.532
0.532
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
41.86
56.19
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.48
28.56
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
141
189.26
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
180
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.135
0.135
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.566
0.566
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
46.87
62.92
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.41
24.52
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
8.94
8.94
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
15
20.13
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
60
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
33.33
33.33
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Spencer Adams and Erkie Wilson
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
130
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.17
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
522
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
6.26
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
488
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
5.48
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.49
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.754
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.667
4.667
Spencer Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
Erkie Wilson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.78