Jim Adams vs. Paul Radford — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul Radford posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Adams. Paul Radford posted stronger numbers in OPS (.660 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.351 vs .250). Jim Adams had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .242). By the career numbers, Paul Radford had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Adams and Paul Radford
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
5822
600
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
706.94
72.85
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.72
0.72
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
45.21
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
745.58
76.84
Jim Adams
Career
Per 600 PA
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
12.97
12.97
Fielding Stats for Jim Adams and Paul Radford
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1384
1.05
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
27
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
35469
27
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
6.43
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
4485
3.41
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
6.43
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
3963
3.02
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.36
88.36
Jim Adams
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.863
2.863