Garrett Acton vs. Edwin Almonte — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Garrett Acton and Edwin Almonte are fairly close on the surface numbers. Edwin Almonte posted stronger numbers in WHIP (2.382 vs 2.700) and home runs allowed (2.38 per nine innings vs 4.05). Garrett Acton had the advantage in ERA (10.8 vs 11.12). By the career numbers, Edwin Almonte had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.