Jim Acker vs. Michael Driscoll — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Jim Acker and Michael Driscoll are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jim Acker posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.97 vs 5.4) and WHIP (1.423 vs 1.600). Michael Driscoll had the advantage in home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.82). By the career numbers, Jim Acker had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.